Unknown's avatar

About Glyn and Liz

Writer Liz wainwright and Independent Researcher Glyn Wainwright

Primary prevention with a statin increases mortality.

Unless you have already had an MI, say “no, thank-you” to the recommends statin therapy. Statins lead to cognitive impairment, memory loss, mental confusion, depression, dementia, diabetes, neuropathy, parasthesia and neuralgia, and appeared to be at higher risk to the debilitating neurological diseases, ALS and Parkinson’s disease.
The statin industry has enjoyed a thirty year run of steadily cooking the data.
TREAT HEART DISEASE: Spend significant time outdoors; evidence of the benefits of sun exposure to the heart is compelling,……..
eat healthy, cholesterol with animal-based foods like eggs, eat fermented foods like yogurt and sour cream; eat foods rich in sulfur like onions and garlic

James J. King September 22, 2012 12:19 (EDT) see comment #1

Cholesterol Lowering increases Diabetes Risk

Xia et al. inhibited a late step in the biosynthesis of de-novo cholesterol in murine and human pancreatic β cells [8] and published their findings in 2008. They had previously shown that insulin secretion was sensitive to the acute removal of membrane cholesterol. They now demonstrate that the depletion of membrane cholesterol impairs calcium voltage channels, insulin secretory granule creation, and mobilisation and membrane fusion.
This paper [8] clearly demonstrates that a direct causal link exists between membrane cholesterol depletion and the failure of insulin secretion. Their work is in close accord with data from some statin trials, which also connect cholesterol reduction with increased risk of type 2 diabetes; indeed, statin use has been shown to be associated with a rise of fasting plasma glucose in patients with and without diabetes [9]. The underlying mechanisms of the potential adverse effects of statins on carbohydrate homeostasis are complex [10] and might be related to the lipophilicity of the statin [11]. Indeed, retrospective analysis of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS) revealed that 5 years of treatment with pravastatin reduced diabetes incidence by 30% [12]. The authors suggested that although lowering of trigliceride levels could have influenced diabetes incidence, other mechanisms such as anti-inflammatory action might have been involved; however, in the multivariate Cox model, baseline total cholesterol did not predict the development of diabetes [12]. Furthermore, pravastatin did not decrease diabetes incidence in the LIPID trial which included glucose intolerant
patients [13]. On the other hand, in the JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin), which studied apparently healthy persons without hyperlipidemia but with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels [14], the risk of diabetes was increased by a factor of 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05 to 1.51] among individuals receiving rosuvastatin 20 mg daily with respect to placebo. Strikingly, among  persons assigned to rosuvastatin, the median low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level at 12 months was 55 mg per deciliter [interquartile range, 44 to 72
(1.1 to 1.9)]. It is intriguing that salutary lifestyle measures, which might exert their beneficial action through an anti-inflammatory mechanism without a strong
cholesterol-lowering effect, beyond reducing cardiovascular events and total mortality, reduce also the risk of diabetes and other chronic degenerative diseases. This fact may represent a ‘justification’ not to use a drug in low-risk primary prevention populations: lowering cholesterol at the expense of increasing diabetes might be counterproductive over the long-term.

Diabetes Slide

References for Diabetes

8. Xia F, Xie L, Mihic A, et al. Inhibition of cholesterol
biosynthesis impairs insulin secretion and voltage-gated
calcium channel function in pancreatic beta-cells.
Endocrinology 2008; 149: 5136-45.
9. Sukhija R, Prayaga S, Marashdeh M, et al. Effect of statins
on fasting plasma glucose in diabetic and nondiabetic
patients. J Investig Med 2009; 57: 495-9.
10. Szendroedi J, Anderwald C, Krssak M, et al. Effects of highdose
simvastatin therapy on glucose metabolism and
ectopic lipid deposition in nonobese type 2 diabetic
patients. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 209-14.
11. Ishikawa M, Okajima F, Inoue N, et al. Distinct effects of
pravastatin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin on insulin
secretion from a beta-cell line, MIN6 cells. J Atheroscler
Thromb 2006; 13: 329-35.
12. Freeman DJ, Norrie J, Sattar N, et al. Pravastatin and the
development of diabetes mellitus: evidence for
a protective treatment effect in the West of Scotland
Coronary Prevention Study. Circulation 2001; 103: 357-62.
13. Keech A, Colquhoun D, Best J, et al.; LIPID Study Group.
Secondary prevention of cardiovascular events with longterm
pravastatin in patients with diabetes or impaired
fasting glucose: results from the LIPID trial. Diabetes Care
2003; 26: 2713-21.
14. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al.; JUPITER Study
Group. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men
and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med
2008; 359: 2195-207.

Memories are made of this! – Cholesterol

It is amazing to consider the amount of damage being done by the pursuit of the medical dogma that our heroic ‘cholesterol’ molecules got involved in pathogenesis. Tomorrow I will wake up and the ‘Medical Nightmare’ of blaming fats and cholesterol for CVD will be over.

Synaptogenesis and neural cholesterol

Nowhere is the impact of cholesterol depletion more keenly studied than in the neurologic arena. The work of Pfrieger et al. described the functional role of cholesterol in memory through synaptogenesis [24]. Mauch et al. [25] reported evidence that cholesterol is vital to the formation and correct operation of neurons to such an extent that neurons require additional sources of cholesterol to be secreted by glial cells. A recent mini-review by Jang et al. describes the synaptic vesicle secretion in neurons and its dependence upon cholesterol-rich membrane areas of the synaptic membrane [26]. Furthermore, working on rat brain synaptosomes, Waseem [23] demonstrated that a mere 9.3% decrease in the cholesterol level of the synaptosomal plasma membrane could inhibit exocytosis. These data might be particularly worrisome for lovastatin and simvastatin which are known to cross the blood brain barrier [27].
In fact, the proposed use of statins as a therapeutic agent in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [28] counters Pfrieger’s evidence [24]. Indeed, a reduction in cholesterol synthesis leads to depletion of cholesterol in the lipid rafts – i.e. the de-novo cholesterol is required in the neurons for synaptic function and also in the neuronal membrane fusion pores [29].
Cognitive problems are the second most frequent type of adverse events, after muscle complaints, to be reported with statin therapy [30] and this has  speculatively been attributed to mitochondrial effects. The central nervous sytem (CNS) cholesterol is synthesised in situ and CNS neurons only produce enough cholesterol to survive. The substantial amounts needed for synaptogenesis have to be supplemented by the glia cells. Having previously shown that in rat retinal ganglion cells without glia cells fewer and less efficient synapses could form, Göritz et al. [31] indicate that limiting cholesterol availability from glia directly affects the ability of CNS neurons to create synapses. They note that synthesis, uptake and transport of cholesterol directly impacts the development and plasticity of the synaptic circuitry. We note their very strong implication that local de-novo  cholesterol synthesis in situ is essential in the creation and maintenance of memory.
There should be further consideration of cholesterol depletion on synaptogenesis, behaviours and memory loss for patients undergoing long-term statin therapy. This is particularly important with lipophilic statins which easily cross the blood brain barrier [32].The effects of statins on cognitive function and the therapeutic potential of statins in Alzheimer’s disease are not clearly understood [28]. Two randomised trials of statins versus placebo in relatively younger healthier samples (lovastatin in one, simvastatin in other) showed significant worsening of cognitive indices relative to placebo [33, 34]. On the other hand, two trials in Alzheimer (with atorvastatin and simvastatin respectively) suggested possible trends to cognitive benefit, although these appeared to dissipate at 1 year [35, 36]. A recent Cochrane review concluded that there is good evidence from randomised trials that statins given in late life to individuals at risk of vascular disease have no effect in preventing Alzheimer´s disease or dementia [37]. However, case reports and case series from clinical practice in the real world reported cognitive loss on statins that resolved with discontinuation and recurred with rechallenge [30]. Evidence from observational data and prestatin hypolipidemic randomised trials showed higher hemorrhagic stroke risk with low cholesterol [30].
In fact, in the Stroke Prevention with Aggressive Reductions in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial as compared with placebo, the use of high-dose atorvastatin was associated with a 66% increase in the relative risk of hemorrhagic stroke among the patients receiving the statin drug [38]. In addition to treatment with atorvastatin, an exploratory analysis of the SPARCL trial found that having hemorrhagic stroke as an entry event, male sex, and advancing age at baseline accounted for the great majority of the increased risk of hemorrhagic strokes [39]. However, a sensitivity analysis excluding all patients with a hemorrhagic stroke as an entry event in the SPARCL trial found that statin treatment was still associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke [40]. Furthermore, in a subgroup of patients with a history of cerebrovascular disease enrolled in the Heart Protection Study [41] which did not include patients with hemorrhagic stroke, a similar increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke during followup was demonstrated [40].

24. Pfrieger FW. Role of cholesterol in synapse formation and
function. Biochim Biophys Acta 2003; 1610: 271-80.
25. Mauch DH, Nägler K, Schumacher S, et al. CNS
synaptogenesis promoted by glia-derived cholesterol.
Science 2001; 294: 1354-7.
26. Jang DJ, Park SW, Kaang BK. The role of lipid binding for
the targeting of synaptic proteins into synaptic vesicles.
BMB Rep 2009; 42: 1-5.
27. Saheki A, Terasaki T, Tamai I, Tsuji A. In vivo and in vitro
blood-brain barrier transport of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl
coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors. Pharm Res
1994; 11: 305-11.
28. Kandiah N, Feldman HH. Therapeutic potential of statins
in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci 2009; 283: 230-4.
29. Jeremic A, Jin Cho W, Jena BP. Cholesterol is critical to the
integrity of neuronal porosome/fusion pore. Ultramicroscopy
2006; 106: 674-7.
30. Golomb BA, Evans MA. Statin adverse effects: a review of
the literature and evidence for a mitochondrial mechanism.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2008; 8: 373-418.
31. Göritz C, Mauch DH, Nägler K, Pfrieger FW. Role of gliaderived
cholesterol in synaptogenesis: new revelations in
the synapse-glia affair. J Physiol Paris 2002; 96: 257-63.
32. Vuletic S, Riekse RG, Marcovina SM, Peskind ER, Hazzard
WR, Albers JJ. Statins of different brain penetrability
differentially affect CSF PLTP activity. Dement Geriatr Cogn
Disord 2006; 22: 392-8.
33. Muldoon MF, Barger SD, Ryan CM. et al. Effects of
lovastatin on cognitive function and psychological wellbeing.
Am J Med 2000; 108: 538-46.
34. Muldoon MF, Ryan CM, Sereika SM, Flory JD, Manuck SB.
Randomized trial of the effects of simvastatin on cognitive
functioning in hypercholesterolemic adults. Am J Med
2004; 117: 823-9.
35. Sparks DL, Sabbagh M, Connor D, et al. Statin therapy in
Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl 2006; 185:
78-86.
36. Simons M, Schwärzler F, Lütjohann D, et al. Treatment with
simvastatin in normocholesterolemic patients with
Alzheimer’s disease: A 26-week randomized, placebocontrolled,
double-blind trial. Ann Neurol 2002; 52: 346-50.
37. McGuinness B, Craig D, Bullock R, Passmore P. Statins for
the prevention of dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2009; 2: CD003160.
38. Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A 3rd, et al.; Stroke
Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels
(SPARCL) Investigators. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke
or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:
549-59.
39. Goldstein LB, Amarenco P, Szarek M, et al.; SPARCL
Investigators. Hemorrhagic stroke in the Stroke Prevention
by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels study.
Neurology 2008; 70: 2364-70.
40. Vergouwen MD, de Haan RJ, Vermeulen M, Roos YB.
Statin treatment and the occurrence of hemorrhagic
stroke in patients with a history of cerebrovascular
disease. Stroke 2008; 39: 497-502.

Cholesterol Drugs & Authority Figures

it is worrying to think about how subtle changes in senior politicians behaviours may be caused by their medications.

The neurological effects of cholesterol depletion can produce a wide range of mental conditions reported to be associated with serum cholesterol depletion. Depression, violent behaviour, homicidal
behaviour and suicide are all known associates of cholesterol depletion [58, 59]. In a recent study, cholesterol content was measured in cortical and subcortical tissue of brains from 41 male suicide completers and 21 male controls. Violent suicides were found to have lower gray matter cholesterol content overall compared with nonviolent suicides and controls [60]. Randomised trials with statins have not shown a definite association between cholesterol-lowering
treatment and non-illness mortality from suicides, accidents, and violence [61, 62]. However, statin trials are specifically designed to test drug efficacy, often with run-in phases, and investigators usually
conduct the studies in groups of patients who have few comorbidities and are not using many concomitant medications, and when side effects are measured, their seriousness and severity are not graded. Indeed, in clinical practice it has been suggested that severe anger and irritability may occour in some statin users [63].
Neural systems have significant vulnerability to cholesterol depletion. First is the reduction in the synaptic exocytosis and endocytosis of essential signalling lipoproteins; then comes the vulnerability due to the high dependency of myelination on denovo cholesterol biosynthesis.

58. Lester D. Serum cholesterol levels and suicide: a metaanalysis.
Suicide Life Threat Behav 2002; 32: 333-46.
59. Edgar PF, Hooper AJ, Poa NR, Burnett JR. Violent behavior
associated with hypocholesterolemia due to a novel APOB
gene mutation. Mol Psychiatry 2007; 12: 258-63.
60. Lalovic A, Levy E, Luheshi G, et al. Cholesterol content in
brains of suicide completers. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol
2007; 10: 159-66.
61. Muldoon MF, Manuck SB, Mendelsohn AB, Kaplan JR, Belle
SH. Cholesterol reduction and non-illness mortality: metaanalysis
of randomised clinical trials. BMJ 2001; 322: 11-5.
62. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al.; Cholesterol
Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety
of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective metaanalysis
of data from 90,056 participants in 14
randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005; 366: 1267-78.
63. Golomb BA, Kane T, Dimsdale JE. Severe irritability
associated with statin cholesterol-lowering drugs. QJM
2004; 97: 229-35.

Quote

I loved this book it grabbed me right from the first words and I couldn’t put it down. The characters are so interesting you need to know what happens to them but at the same time are so familiar you feel you have lived next door to them. I understand this is the first part of a trilogy and I can wait to see what happens to Lynda and her family next.

Link

Epidemiological and clinical trial evidence suggests that omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) might have a significant role in the prevention of coronary heart disease. Dietary sources of omega-3 PUFA include fish oils rich in eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid along with plants rich in alpha-linolenic acid. Randomized clinical trials with fish oils (eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid) and alpha-linolenic acid have demonstrated reductions in risk that compare favorably with those seen in landmark secondary prevention trials with lipid-lowering drugs. Several mechanisms explaining the cardioprotective effect of omega-3 PUFAs have been suggested, including antiarrhythmic, hypolipidemic, and antithrombotic roles. Although official US guidelines for the dietary intake of omega-3 PUFAs are not available, several international guidelines have been published. Fish is an important source of omega-3 PUFAs in the US diet.

Sockey Salmon. (Photo courtesy of Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife)

The fats of life: the role of omega-3 fatty acids in the prevention of coronary heart disease.

Link

Recent efforts by medical journal staffs to improve the quality of research papers have had mixed results. Examples are given to show that randomized, placebocontrolled trials are not free from bias and that the failure to include all-cause death rates can be extremely misleading, as can the use of relative risks in the absence of absolute risks. Other examples show how the conclusions in an abstract may not agree with the data in the body of the paper, or do not tell the whole truth. Still others use false surrogate endpoints or faulty trial protocols to favor a desired outcome. The whole picture may be seen as a breakdown of the peer-review system.  – Joel M. Kauffman, Ph.D.

Bias in Recent Papers on Diets and Drugs in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals