Sugar versus Lipids (Fat & Cholesterol)

Cholesterol now deserves a full pardon and should be awarded ‘Freedom of the Body’. We now know cholesterol is (and always was) a hero in all the cells of our bodies. The cell walls are made of fat and cholesterol working together to protect, give shape and function to each cell..So when you seek to lower your cholesterol you can expect some loss of function and ill effects (see http://bit.ly/1LdEqhn for details)

image

Statin Damage: We have seen a huge growth in on-line social media groups complaining bitterly the devastating health effects of statin medications. Statins stop an enzyme in the liver from working, depriving the body of vital substances and signalling compounds (Cholesterol, Hormones and Co-Q10 and more). Eventually tissues break down (muscle & neuron loss) and stop communicating (signalling loss).  The adverse effects are well documented and we have some idea of the numbers  from the FDA’s own FAER database. results have been documented. This “Mevalonate Blockade” is basic cellular biochemistry so the question is why is modern medicine unwilling to acknowledge and deal with this statin damage?

Sugar-Damaged Lipids

After 50 years of blaming cholesterol for upsetting our blood lipids it has come as a shock to the medical profession to find that the guilty party is sugars (fructose & glucose). Diabetics and their clinicians are increasingly commenting on the fact that Lipid tests show improvement (LDL/HDL ratio in blood fats) if excess blood sugar is well managed. The most important number a medical check-up can give you is a blood sugar-damage test called HbA1c or A1c. Get this number under control and the LDL/HDL ratio improves along with general health. The reason that good control of blood sugar improves blood lipids is the reduction in damage caused by sugar to the LDL lipid receptors that absorb the lipids into our cells and organs . The blood LDL lipids are responsible for transporting all the fats, fatty nutrients and cholesterol to our organs to ensure they work.  The HDL collects and returns excess fatty substances for recycling.

image

So it was sugar that stopped the cycle from working – not cholesterol!

An ultimately lethal combination of excess blood sugar, low-fat diets and statins is doing huge harm among our mature population.

Fortunately many patients abandon statins after a few months of experiencing their effects but some persist believing they owe their lives to the misguided claims that they prevent heart disease. Some pharmaceutical companies fund CPD courses on which Doctors are advised to see the statin side-effects as part of the progression of the diseases the statins are claimed to prevent. Treating statin adverse side-effects adds to profitability and makes good financial sense. This is a poor unethical way for drug for the Pharmaceutical Industry to behave and independent regulatory investigation is urgently required. The problem is finding independent experts who are not ultimately dependent of the system for funding!

image

What has changed is the science. Over recent decades evidence was building that blood sugar-damage was damaging the lipid nutrition cycle by attacking the LDL receptor mechanisms.

image

Excess Sugar+ Low-Fat+ Statins = Debilitating Deterioration of Organs

Link

Zoe Harcombe et al. brilliantly expose the erroneous basis of much official dietary advice.

PDF (Size:82KB) PP. 240-244   DOI: 10.4236/fns.2013.43032

ABSTRACT

Background: Since 1984 UK citizens have been advised to reduce total dietary fat intake to 30% of total energy and saturated fat intake to 10%. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence [NICE] suggests a further benefit for Coronary Heart Disease [CHD] prevention by reducing saturated fat [SFA] intake to 6% – 7% of total energy and that 30,000 lives could be saved by replacing SFAs with Polyunsaturated fats [PUFAs]. Methods: 20 volumes of the Seven Countries Study, the seminal work behind the 1984 nutritional guidelines, were assessed. The evidence upon which the NICE guidance was based was reviewed. Nutritional facts about fat and the UK intake of fat are presented and the impact of macronutrient confusion on public health dietary advice is discussed. Findings: The Seven Countries study classified processed foods, primarily carbohydrates, as saturated fats. The UK government and NICE do the same, listing biscuits, cakes, pastries and savoury snacks as saturated fats. Processed foods should be the target of public health advice but not natural fats, in which the UK diet is deficient. With reference to the macro and micro nutrient composition of meat, fish, eggs, and dairy foods the article demonstrates that dietary trials cannot change one type of fat for another in a controlled study. Interpretation: The evidence suggests that processed food is strongly associated with the increase in obesity, diabetes, CHD, and other modern illness in our society. The macro and micro nutrients found in meat, fish, eggs and dairy products, are vital for human health and consumption of these nutritious foods should be encouraged.

The Wrong Dietary Advice?

Link

Zoe raises some very important conflict of interest issues that are seeping into our medical charities

The British Heart Foundation (BHF) describes itself as “a charity that aims to prevent people dying from heart diseases”. Until now, the BHF has remained relatively conflict free – a paragon of virtue in fact when compared with some other ‘heart charities’. Heart UK, for example, calls itself the cholesterol charity (cholesterol should have a charity for having become endangered, but that’s not what they mean!) Heart UK partners with drug companies, the very companies that profit beyond wild dreams from the lucrative war on this life vital substance, as their partner list confirms.

I receive a copy of the BHF magazine, which comes out six times a year. It is called “Heart Matters” and should be commended for having no adverts. It should also be completely ignored because the high carb/low fat/fear cholesterol advice is doing serious harm. However, at least the BHF has appeared free from conflict – until now…

Zoe

The British Heart Foundation & Flora pro.activ – Conflict of Interest?

Link

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:”Table Normal”;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:””;
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:”Calibri”,”sans-serif”;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”;
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

Over the 40 years from 1969 to 2009, I had a forty year anecdotal adventure in biochemistry leading to the publication of a seminal paper on cell-membranes and an invitation to contribute more biochemical thoughts in new hypotheses about modern medicine.  12 years involved in teaching chemistry followed by 28 years in Information technology.

image

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-GB
X-NONE
X-NONE

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

The anecdotal adventures in biochemistry started in the 1970s. Working as a chemistry teacher I found myself increasingly troubled by contact dermatitis and eczema.   This career trauma led to my retraining as a computer scientist and information technologist, a cleaner environment in which to survive and explore modern science.

The Anecdotal Biochemist

Link

Fighting the flab means fighting makers of fatty foods -WRONG !!!  – New Scientist Opinion Column

My response to this article in New Scientist this week:-

Carbohydrates and insulin are obesogenic and dietary fats are not obesogenic.

The Danish politicians who taxed fat were the victims of erroneous medical advice.

Sugar causes obesity, and we explain further in our research review paper:

Is the metabolic syndrome caused by a high fructose, and relatively low fat, low cholesterol diet?

Seneff S, Wainwright G, Mascitelli L.

Arch Med Sci. 2011 Feb;7(1):8-20 Epub 2011 Mar 8.

doi: 10.5114/aoms.2011.20598

PMCID: PMC3258689

Dietary Fats are not Obesogenic – Sugar does it!

Link

Fat and cholesterol are good for you -see Zoe’s blog for details.

Graph from WHO data

WHO data on Fats (Female) ZH

Zoe Harcombe:

All you need to do is to look at the lines going down to the right and wonder how on earth we ever got away with telling people that cholesterol causes heart disease. High cholesterol is associated with lower heart disease and vice versa – for all the data available in the world. High cholesterol is not even associated with high heart disease, let alone does it cause it.

WHO Cholesterol data

Cholesterol & heart disease – there is a relationship, but it’s not what you think

Fats, Carbohydrates and Proteins

Deprive yourself: The real benefits of fasting

Emma Young – New Scientist 14 November 2012

THERE’S a fuzz in my brain and an ache in my gut. My legs are leaden and my eyesight is blurry. But I have only myself to blame. Besides, I have been assured that these symptoms will pass. Between 10 days and three weeks from now, my body will adjust to the new regime, which entails fasting for two days each week. In the meantime, I just need to keep my eyes on the prize. Forget breakfast and second breakfast, ignore the call of multiple afternoon snacks, because the pay offs of doing without could be enormous.

What about Low-Carb Hi-Fat instead?

The above quote come from a New Scientist which article covers the same Eat, Fast and Live Long territory of recent BBC TV programme.  It looks as though they have not shed much light in this research due to the same popular pre-conceptions and misconceptions about LDLs.

The usual erroneous use of ‘bad’ cholesterol in association with Low-density lipoprotein hardly is a common error. Although raised blood LDL is associated with heart disease it is not the cause.  The cause is sugar damage to the LDL label which prevents it delivering its payload of fats and fat soluble nutrition to the fat-starved organs of the body. The brain needs huge amounts.

The common medical response to our vital organs being LDL starved is to reduce our fat intake. What they should be doing is preventing the sugar-damage to LDL labels allowing our organs to recognise and consume the LDL associated nutrients.

This is what happens when association of LDL with disease is confused with causation. A complete farce which has blinded medical science for 50 years and more!

Eating carbohydrates will generate sugar which insulin will convert into fat.

Eating proteins instead will generate damaging oxides of nitrogen.

Eating fat makes good sense and will not make you fat.

Low-Carb High-Fat diets achieve what fasting achieves without the same hunger!