Sugar Damage and Dementia

A normal brain requires reliable supplies of fatty nutrients supplied by the liver as LDL. LDLs are fatty packets of nutrients travelling in the blood to feed the brain and other organs.  LDL receptors on the organs recognise the LDL packets and absorb them. The ‘empty packets’ (HDL), carrying waste for recycling, return to the liver via the blood stream.
image

Over time sugars damage the LDL labels, and thus stop the nutrients from being recognised by the brain’s LDL receptors. Consequently LDL stays in the blood and less HDL packets are produced.  This raised LDL. and lower HDL. is associated with poor health. The cause is sugar-damage. image

Sugar damage causes the brain to be starved of vital fat and cholesterol.

Treatments which lower ‘LDL cholesterol’ do not help. They further deprive the brain of LDL, The brain and other organs become starved of fatty nutrients. Meanwhile, any excess dietary sugars (fructose & glucose) become the cause many ‘diabetes associated’ illnesses.

Fructose, which is increasingly being added to food products, is the new problem sugar. It is more reactive and 10 times more damaging than glucose.

The vital fatty nutrients in LDL are falsely called ‘Bad Cholesterol’.

Raised blood lipids (LDL) are a symptom, and again the cause is sugar-damage.

Is it any wonder that years of the dogmatic policy of ‘Cholesterol Reduction’ have failed to deliver health benefits, and is fraught with problems such as muscle wastage, diabetes and dementia?

The above is a very simplified overview of our paper. If you click on this link you can read our full paper, as published in the Archives of Medical Science.

Click here for our Dementia Paper

(These are ‘free access’ publications)

Link

The diet was hatched in Poland some 40 years ago by Dr. Jan Kwasniewski, who started developing it while working as a dietician for a military sanitarium in Ciechocinek, Poland. There he observed that many of his patients were sick, “not because of any pathogenic factors … but the result of one underlying cause – bad nutrition,” according to his English language “Optimal Nutrition” book. After experimenting on his family and himself, Kwasniewski concluded that the ideal nutritional combo came from eating three grams of fat for every one gram of protein and half a gram of carbohydrates.

Petro Dobromylskyj

Praise the Lard – indeed!

Link

Lech Walesa was diabetic. He was on 52 units of insulin a day, spent 3 days a month in hospital and was under the care of 3 different ‘experts’. He was then treated by Dr Jan Kwasniewski, who has been successfully treating diabetics for 30 years on a low carb/high fat diet. Lech Walesa is no longer diabetic. The body converts carbs straight into glucose.

Petro Dobromylskyj

Diabetes – Lech Walesa

Cholesterol Lowering increases Diabetes Risk

Xia et al. inhibited a late step in the biosynthesis of de-novo cholesterol in murine and human pancreatic β cells [8] and published their findings in 2008. They had previously shown that insulin secretion was sensitive to the acute removal of membrane cholesterol. They now demonstrate that the depletion of membrane cholesterol impairs calcium voltage channels, insulin secretory granule creation, and mobilisation and membrane fusion.
This paper [8] clearly demonstrates that a direct causal link exists between membrane cholesterol depletion and the failure of insulin secretion. Their work is in close accord with data from some statin trials, which also connect cholesterol reduction with increased risk of type 2 diabetes; indeed, statin use has been shown to be associated with a rise of fasting plasma glucose in patients with and without diabetes [9]. The underlying mechanisms of the potential adverse effects of statins on carbohydrate homeostasis are complex [10] and might be related to the lipophilicity of the statin [11]. Indeed, retrospective analysis of the West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS) revealed that 5 years of treatment with pravastatin reduced diabetes incidence by 30% [12]. The authors suggested that although lowering of trigliceride levels could have influenced diabetes incidence, other mechanisms such as anti-inflammatory action might have been involved; however, in the multivariate Cox model, baseline total cholesterol did not predict the development of diabetes [12]. Furthermore, pravastatin did not decrease diabetes incidence in the LIPID trial which included glucose intolerant
patients [13]. On the other hand, in the JUPITER trial (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin), which studied apparently healthy persons without hyperlipidemia but with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels [14], the risk of diabetes was increased by a factor of 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05 to 1.51] among individuals receiving rosuvastatin 20 mg daily with respect to placebo. Strikingly, among  persons assigned to rosuvastatin, the median low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level at 12 months was 55 mg per deciliter [interquartile range, 44 to 72
(1.1 to 1.9)]. It is intriguing that salutary lifestyle measures, which might exert their beneficial action through an anti-inflammatory mechanism without a strong
cholesterol-lowering effect, beyond reducing cardiovascular events and total mortality, reduce also the risk of diabetes and other chronic degenerative diseases. This fact may represent a ‘justification’ not to use a drug in low-risk primary prevention populations: lowering cholesterol at the expense of increasing diabetes might be counterproductive over the long-term.

Diabetes Slide

References for Diabetes

8. Xia F, Xie L, Mihic A, et al. Inhibition of cholesterol
biosynthesis impairs insulin secretion and voltage-gated
calcium channel function in pancreatic beta-cells.
Endocrinology 2008; 149: 5136-45.
9. Sukhija R, Prayaga S, Marashdeh M, et al. Effect of statins
on fasting plasma glucose in diabetic and nondiabetic
patients. J Investig Med 2009; 57: 495-9.
10. Szendroedi J, Anderwald C, Krssak M, et al. Effects of highdose
simvastatin therapy on glucose metabolism and
ectopic lipid deposition in nonobese type 2 diabetic
patients. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 209-14.
11. Ishikawa M, Okajima F, Inoue N, et al. Distinct effects of
pravastatin, atorvastatin, and simvastatin on insulin
secretion from a beta-cell line, MIN6 cells. J Atheroscler
Thromb 2006; 13: 329-35.
12. Freeman DJ, Norrie J, Sattar N, et al. Pravastatin and the
development of diabetes mellitus: evidence for
a protective treatment effect in the West of Scotland
Coronary Prevention Study. Circulation 2001; 103: 357-62.
13. Keech A, Colquhoun D, Best J, et al.; LIPID Study Group.
Secondary prevention of cardiovascular events with longterm
pravastatin in patients with diabetes or impaired
fasting glucose: results from the LIPID trial. Diabetes Care
2003; 26: 2713-21.
14. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al.; JUPITER Study
Group. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men
and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med
2008; 359: 2195-207.

Medical Dogma – Fats and Cholesterol

How did our health authorities miss the role of sugars as the primary cause of age related illness in modern civilization.   There are many reasons why authorities under pressure to debate, judge and decide are confused about the difference between association with causation.   Almost every day we are subject to statistics which are misunderstood.  Although more than 80% of heart attack victims in America are English speaking it is clearly not a cause.  Statistics  can be used to show that  patients travelling to hospital in ambulances have higher morbidities than those travelling by public transport.

The causes of modern diseases have erroneously been attributed to dietary fat and cholesterol.  This erroneous dogma conflicts with the causative evidence that Carbohydrate (Sugar generating foods) are the real issue in modern diets.

AGEs & RAGEs